HW Feb. 25th

Describe three of LaPierre's main claims.
LaPierre writes this article on reflection of the Newtown, Connecticut shooting in December of 2012. This tragedy resulted in the deaths of many young children at a school due to a mental unstable man by the name of Adam Lanza. The first claim that LaPierre makes in his article is that something must be done, today, now, in order better protect our generation of children in schools. There must be action taken to prevent further tragedies like this one. The second claim that LaPierre makes is that guns do not have to translate to a "bad" thing. He mentions that police with guns are good guys, secret service agents with guns are also good guys, why not implement good guys like these at schools to install a better peace of mind? Finally LaPierre claims that the NRA is going to bring all of its knowledge dedication and resources into establishing a National School Shield Emergency Response Program for every school that wants it. Which should be implemented in all schools across the nation.

What are two strategies he uses to persuade his audience?
Two strategies that LaPierre's utilizes in persuading the audience is through many quotes of reliable, trustworthy authority figures in the nation (Authorities/Big Names) , as well as many examples and statistics (logos). 

What are some of the strengths of LaPierre's argument (consider the rhetorical situation).
Some strengths of LaPierre's argument is his ability to get the audiences attention. Through using big names of authority throughout the paper, he builds trust and a sense that if more powerful people are in support, we as an audience should be in support as well. He also instills a fighting sense in all readers as well when speaking about "our" children, "our" loved ones. LaPierre makes the argument all the more personal to everyone. Lastly, a strength that is also evident is his use of factual evidence in the form of statistics. These catch the readers attention in regards to the large numbers that LaPierre uses to convey information.

What potential weaknesses can you identify.
Some potential weaknesses that I can find in LaPierre's writings is that in certain areas of the texts his tone can be a little condescending. Its as if he is scolding the readers and yelling, when he should be trying to rally their support and inspire them to do more about the situation at hand.